0.00/0.04 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.20/0.46 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu 0.20/0.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.20/0.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.20/0.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.20/0.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.20/0.46 % CPULimit : 1440 0.20/0.46 % WCLimit : 180 0.20/0.46 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 11:41:52 UTC 2026 0.20/0.46 % CPUTime : 0.20/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.23/0.53 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.23/0.56 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9XXMIbTgYk/E---3.1_1318555.p 0.23/0.59 % Version: 3.5.1-ho 0.23/0.59 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNSFN. 0.23/0.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.23/0.59 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores 0.23/0.59 % Starting post_as_ho5 with 180s (1) cores 0.23/0.59 % Starting sh4l with 180s (1) cores 0.23/0.59 % Starting ho_unfolding_2 with 180s (1) cores 0.23/0.59 % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 1318568 completed with status 0 0.23/0.59 % Result found by ho_unfolding_3 0.23/0.59 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNSFN. 0.23/0.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.23/0.59 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores 0.23/0.59 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 0.23/0.59 % No SInE strategy applied 0.23/0.59 % Search class: HGUSF-FFSF21-MSFFMMBN 0.23/0.59 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.23/0.59 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 91s (1) cores 0.23/0.59 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 541s (1) cores 0.23/0.59 % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 91s (1) cores 0.23/0.59 % Starting sh5l with 91s (1) cores 0.23/0.59 % Starting new_bool_3 with 86s (1) cores 0.23/0.59 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1318572 completed with status 10 0.23/0.59 % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 1318574 completed with status 0 0.23/0.59 % Result found by ho_unfolding_3 0.23/0.59 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNSFN. 0.23/0.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.23/0.59 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores 0.23/0.59 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 0.23/0.59 % No SInE strategy applied 0.23/0.59 % Search class: HGUSF-FFSF21-MSFFMMBN 0.23/0.59 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.23/0.59 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 91s (1) cores 0.23/0.59 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 541s (1) cores 0.23/0.59 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s 0.23/0.59 % Presaturation interreduction done 0.23/0.59 0.23/0.59 % Proof found! 0.23/0.59 % SZS status Theorem 0.23/0.59 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.23/0.59 thf(decl_23, type, c0: $i). 0.23/0.59 thf(decl_24, type, cS: $i > $i). 0.23/0.59 thf(decl_25, type, cEVEN1: $i > $o). 0.23/0.59 thf(decl_26, type, cODD1: $i > $o). 0.23/0.59 thf(decl_27, type, esk1_2: $i > ($i > $o) > $i). 0.23/0.59 thf(decl_28, type, esk1_1: $i > $i). 0.23/0.59 thf(cODD1_def, axiom, ((cODD1)=(^[X1:$i]:(~((cEVEN1 @ X1))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9XXMIbTgYk/E---3.1_1318555.p', cODD1_def)). 0.23/0.59 thf(cEVEN1_def, axiom, ((cEVEN1)=(^[X1:$i]:(![X2:$i > $o]:((((((X2 @ c0))&(![X3:$i]:((((X2 @ X3))=>((X2 @ (cS @ (cS @ X3)))))))))=>((X2 @ X1))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9XXMIbTgYk/E---3.1_1318555.p', cEVEN1_def)). 0.23/0.59 thf(cTHM405, conjecture, (?[X1:$i]:((cODD1 @ X1))<=(![X4:$i, X5:$i]:((((cS @ X4)=(cS @ X5))=>((X4)=(X5))))&![X6:$i]:(((cS @ X6)!=(c0))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9XXMIbTgYk/E---3.1_1318555.p', cTHM405)). 0.23/0.59 thf(c_0_3, plain, ((cODD1)=(^[Z0:$i]:(~((![X11:$i > $o]:((((((X11 @ c0))&(![X12:$i]:((((X11 @ X12))=>((X11 @ (cS @ (cS @ X12)))))))))=>((X11 @ Z0))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cODD1_def])). 0.23/0.59 thf(c_0_4, plain, ((cEVEN1)=(^[Z0:$i]:(![X2:$i > $o]:((((((X2 @ c0))&(![X3:$i]:((((X2 @ X3))=>((X2 @ (cS @ (cS @ X3)))))))))=>((X2 @ Z0))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cEVEN1_def])). 0.23/0.59 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~((?[X1:$i]:((cODD1 @ X1))<=(![X4:$i, X5:$i]:((((cS @ X4)=(cS @ X5))=>((X4)=(X5))))&![X6:$i]:(((cS @ X6)!=(c0)))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM405])). 0.23/0.59 thf(c_0_6, plain, ((cODD1)=(^[Z0:$i]:(~((![X11:$i > $o]:((((((X11 @ c0))&(![X12:$i]:((((X11 @ X12))=>((X11 @ (cS @ (cS @ X12)))))))))=>((X11 @ Z0))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])). 0.23/0.59 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~(((![X4:$i, X5:$i]:((((cS @ X4)=(cS @ X5))=>((X4)=(X5))))&![X6:$i]:(((cS @ X6)!=(c0))))=>?[X1:$i]:(~(![X13:$i > $o]:((((X13 @ c0)&![X14:$i]:(((X13 @ X14)=>(X13 @ (cS @ (cS @ X14))))))=>(X13 @ X1))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])])). 0.23/0.59 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X15:$i, X16:$i, X17:$i, X18:$i, X19:$i > $o]:((((((cS @ X15)!=(cS @ X16))|((X15)=(X16)))&((cS @ X17)!=(c0)))&(((X19 @ (esk1_2 @ X18 @ X19))|~(X19 @ c0)|(X19 @ X18))&(~(X19 @ (cS @ (cS @ (esk1_2 @ X18 @ X19))))|~(X19 @ c0)|(X19 @ X18))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])])])). 0.23/0.59 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i]:((((X1)=(X3))|((cS @ X1)!=(cS @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.23/0.59 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:(((X2 @ X1)|~((X2 @ (cS @ (cS @ (esk1_2 @ X1 @ X2)))))|~((X2 @ c0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.23/0.59 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(((esk1_1 @ (cS @ X1))=(X1))), inference(recognize_injectivity,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.23/0.59 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((cS @ (cS @ (esk1_2 @ X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((Z0)!=(X1)))))))=(X1))|((c0)=(X1)))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_10])). 0.23/0.59 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(((cS @ X1)!=(c0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.23/0.59 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((cS @ (esk1_2 @ X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((Z0)!=(X1))))))=(esk1_1 @ X1))|((c0)=(X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])). 0.23/0.59 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((c0)=(X1))|((esk1_1 @ X1)!=(c0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14])). 0.23/0.59 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_11]), c_0_13])]), ['proof']). 0.23/0.59 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.23/0.59 % Parsed axioms : 7 0.23/0.59 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.23/0.59 % Initial clauses : 8 0.23/0.59 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4 0.23/0.59 % Initial clauses in saturation : 4 0.23/0.59 % Processed clauses : 18 0.23/0.59 % ...of these trivial : 0 0.23/0.59 % ...subsumed : 2 0.23/0.59 % ...remaining for further processing : 16 0.23/0.59 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4 0.23/0.59 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.23/0.59 % Backward-subsumed : 0 0.23/0.59 % Backward-rewritten : 0 0.23/0.59 % Generated clauses : 29 0.23/0.59 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 19 0.23/0.59 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.23/0.59 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.23/0.59 % Paramodulations : 13 0.23/0.59 % Factorizations : 0 0.23/0.59 % NegExts : 1 0.23/0.59 % Equation resolutions : 5 0.23/0.59 % Disequality decompositions : 0 0.23/0.59 % Total rewrite steps : 0 0.23/0.59 % ...of those cached : 0 0.23/0.59 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.23/0.59 % Propositional check models : 0 0.23/0.59 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.23/0.59 % Propositional clauses : 0 0.23/0.59 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.23/0.59 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.23/0.59 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.23/0.59 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.23/0.59 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.23/0.59 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.23/0.59 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.23/0.59 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.23/0.59 % Current number of processed clauses : 11 0.23/0.59 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1 0.23/0.59 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.23/0.59 % Negative unit clauses : 1 0.23/0.59 % Non-unit-clauses : 9 0.23/0.59 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9 0.23/0.59 % ...number of literals in the above : 22 0.23/0.59 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.23/0.59 % Current number of archived clauses : 5 0.23/0.59 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13 0.23/0.59 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13 0.23/0.59 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.23/0.59 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.23/0.59 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.23/0.59 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0 0.23/0.59 % BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.23/0.59 % Condensation attempts : 18 0.23/0.59 % Condensation successes : 0 0.23/0.59 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1084 0.23/0.59 % Search garbage collected termcells : 213 0.23/0.59 0.23/0.59 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.23/0.59 % User time : 0.009 s 0.23/0.59 % System time : 0.005 s 0.23/0.59 % Total time : 0.013 s 0.23/0.59 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages 0.23/0.59 0.23/0.59 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.23/0.59 % User time : 0.020 s 0.23/0.59 % System time : 0.016 s 0.23/0.59 % Total time : 0.036 s 0.23/0.59 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages 0.23/0.59 % E exiting 0.23/0.59 EOF